Sugar Flames Page
Static Test
Excel Sheets
About Me

                                         Dexiron motor burn 8-05
                                                                Augmented Dextrose based fuel.
This was the seventh documented test using –325 mesh iron as an additive in my quest to achieve a flame on par with the flame present in composite fuels. The first five test using 5% iron in a Sorbitol based fuel (while successful in creating a flame) did not meet the goal in terms of flame size and color. Test six utilized 10% iron in a Sorbitol based fuel and was successful in achieving both the flame size and color goals. The results of that test are posted on the Sorbitol Flame web page.

For this test I decided to use dextrose as my base fuel because it is a readily available fuel, easy to work with, more cost effective than Sorbitol and has been highly documented with other experimentalist.

When burn testing at 1 atm the burn rate was noted as 11 seconds per inch. This is more than 20% slower than the Sorbitol based fuel. I suspect the dextrose will require a longer heating time after melting to remove residual moisture. Also noted (after the test strand was burned) was a fair amount of residue left in the shape of the test strand itself. It appeared to be unburned iron. Again I suspect the residual moisture was the cause of this.

The grains were allowed to cure for 6 days before firing. The motor took a little longer to come up to pressure than usual and that is thought to be caused by the use of a new type of igniter. The total burn time was slightly longer than with Sorbitol, but when the delay lag is taken into consideration the times are within .05 seconds of one another. This was a bit of a surprise because I expected the dextrose to have a faster burn time than the Sorbitol. Again I suspect moisture in the fuel. About 6 grams of residue were present when the motor was taken apart for cleaning. This was not the case with the Sorbitol based fuel. More testing will have to be done.

Overall I was very happy with this test and the flame was somewhat longer and more defined than with the Sorbitol based fuel. The ISP was right on track with what I have grown to expect with this formula and my method of preparation.

                    For a better look at this fuel check out this static test.


    Again I hope you find this information useful in your rocket endeavors.